Schrodinger vs, Hiesenburg confusion
As, I'm sure everyone is aware Schrodingers cat thought experiement was a put forward to highlight some of the paradoxes present in quantum theory if you subscribed to the so called copenhagen interpretation - namely regarding the super posistion of states were the wave form does not collapse into a particle (or specific waveform) until observed - that is the observing is inherently entangled with the state of the object being observed (of course this is non-sense paradox (oxymoron?) to think about given the limitation of the spped of light bieng the max speed and time only going in one direction).
Where as Hiesenberg's uncertainly principle also a quantum effect, relates to the fact you can not increase precision in undertanding velocity (kinetic enegery state - same holds for other energies) without reducing the accuracy of measurement of position; or vv.
Therefore, related to the OPs position. Both could be used, but not as intended above byt he posters! sorry
For Schrodingers - at present he's employment waveform (as far as we 'the observers' are concerned) is smeard across both leaving and staying - it is only when he posts that we will be certain. In QM there is actually very little entanglement here.
For Hiesenberg - we could know with increasing accuracy more about where the OP is.(e.g more detials about staying) or more details about where he is going (leaving) but not a higher level of accuracy about both..
If you want him to both stay and go .. may I suggest leaving physics and heading to metaphysics
Perhaps Descartes dualisitc seperation between body and mnd. that is his body could stay but his mind leave?
oh yes - am bored on a Friday afternoon conf call - and not playing mahjong today.